Greenlines

Volume 8, Number 1, September 2005

WGEA Home

Greenlines Archive

Click here for PDF (255k)

Message from Associate Chair of WGEA

I hope you will enjoy the new format of our Greenlines. As members, you can look forward to short news briefs from our international community and feature stories that bridge the challenges of environmental auditing. Thank you to our colleagues at the U.S. GAO, who have led the work to re-invigorate this newsletter. They welcome comments and suggestions regarding the new format.

I am pleased to welcome three new Steering Committee members- Cameroon , Indonesia, and Sri Lanka–and two new WGEA members–Turks and Caicos Islands, and Uganda. The WGEA now has 53 members.

Johanne Gélinas
Commissioner of the Environment and Sustainable Development
Canada

Feature Story

Contraloría General de la República of Costa Rica Sees Results From its Audit of Pesticides Registration and Control

Costa Rica—Like many countries whose economies depend heavily on agriculture, Costa Rica must ensure that the pesticides used to improve crop production do not pose unacceptable risks to human health and the environment. Recent audits by the country’s Contraloría General de la República (CGR), however, have raised serious questions about these risks, and have pointed the way to needed improvements (more...)

News Briefs from
Around the SAI
World

Read about your fellow auditors' work
on environmental issues

BANGLADESH: WGEA-IDI Training Launches Environmental Auditing Efforts

BHUTAN: Environmental Issues Become a Priority for Bhutan Government

BRAZIL: Environmental Auditing Training In OLACEFS Region Viewed as a Success

CHILE: SAI Audits Government's Compliance with CITES

COSTA RICA: SAI Evaluates "Co-Management" of the National Marine Park Ballena

DENMARK: SAI Coordinates a Multi-SAI Audit of Baltic Sea Pollution

ESTONIA: State Audit Office Honored with Green Action Award

INDONESIA: Audit Board Co-sponsors International Conference on Auditing Tsunami Relief Funds

MONGOLIA: SAI Plans for Environmental Auditing Training

NETHERLANDS: Audit Finds Problems with Efforts to Clean Up Polluted Soil

NORWAY: SAI Completing Audit on Biodiversity

PERU: SAI Plans for Multiple Environmental Audits

SRI LANKA: Environmental Auditing Seen as Growing in Importance

WGEA News

The XVIII INCOSAI in Budapest is a success!

Steering Committee approves project work plans for 2005-07

Next WGEA meeting in Moscow

Professional exchanges in environmental auditing

What's new on the Web

Do you have comments on the new format of Greenlines?
Click here to send us an e-mail.

Back to Top

Feature Story

Contraloría General de la República of Costa Rica Sees Results From its Audit of Agricultural Pesticides Registration and Control

By: Lilliam Marín Guillén
Contraloría General de la República of Costa Rica


Source: Regional Institute of Studies in Toxic Substances Pesticides
National University of Costa Rica

Costa Rica—Like many countries whose economies depend heavily on agriculture, Costa Rica must ensure that the pesticides used to improve crop production do not pose unacceptable risks to human health and the environment. Recent audits by the country’s Contraloría General de la República (CGR), however, have raised serious questions about these risks, and have pointed the way to needed improvements in the way the nation’s Ministry of Agriculture regulates pesticides.

With products as varied as pineapple, chayote, manioc, ferns, bananas, coffee, melons, and sugar cane, Costa Rica has one of the most diverse agricultural export industries in all of Latin America. In 2004, Costa Rica exported $2.015 billion in agricultural products, representing 32.4% of total Costa Rican exports. Agricultural activities also accounted for 14.3% of the nation’s employment. Yet the country’s heavy reliance on agriculture has resulted in heavy use of pesticides. According to the World Health Organization, in the last ten years, Costa Rica’s average rate of agricultural pesticides use has increased more than any other country in Central America and the Caribbean.

The Costa Rican Constitution guarantees every citizen the right to life, health, and a healthy and ecologically balanced environment. Yet without proper government regulation, the negative impacts of agricultural pesticides could contribute to both low agricultural yields and high risks to human health and the environment. Consequently, through a required pesticide registration process, the Ministry of Agriculture is charged with ensuring the soundness of pesticides entering the market. The Ministry is also charged with ensuring proper and efficient use of pesticides already in use through the appropriate training for farmers and other growers, and through inspections that help to ensure that pesticide residues in vegetables and other agricultural products are at levels safe enough for human consumption.


Source: Regional Institute of Studies in Toxic Substances Pesticides
National University of Costa Rica

Given the economic and environmental importance of agricultural pesticide use, the CGR recently evaluated the Ministry of Agriculture’s efforts to register and control the use of synthetic pesticides for agricultural purposes. In addition, the CGR evaluated procedures to monitor and control the presence of pesticide residues in vegetables. The audit resulted in two reports that found serious problems with the Ministry of Agriculture’s efforts in these areas (available at http://www.cgr.go.cr) Among its key findings:

  • The Ministry of Agriculture did not obtain required information on agricultural pesticides from the companies that import, manufacture, and sell them in Costa Rica. For example, the Ministry failed to collect information on the physical and chemical properties, efficacy, impurity profiles, and toxicological and ecotoxicological effects of various pesticides—information which is needed to assess pesticide quality and the associated risks to the environment and public health.
  • Some companies improperly registered their pesticides at the Ministry using information from other previously registered pesticides. As a result, some pesticides were sold and used in Costa Rica even through they were never properly evaluated and registered by the Ministry of Agriculture for environmental and public health risks.
  • Serious omissions and deficiencies exist in the pesticide registration requirements. The Government further weakened these requirements by enacting executive decrees without consulting the Ministries of Health and Environment.
  • The Ministry failed to establish policies and appropriate inspection procedures to control the quality of pesticides and residues found on vegetable crops for human consumption. The CGR found that vegetables with pesticide residues exceeding internationally-allowed limits had been sold in local markets. In some cases, the Ministry had determined through laboratory tests that residues exceeded the maximum allowable limits, but did not pursue legal action against those responsible. The Ministry also failed to perform follow-up actions in order to prevent the future occurrence of similar contamination.


Source: Regional Institute of Studies in Toxic Substances Pesticides
National University of Costa Rica

The CGR made a number of specific recommendations to the Ministry of Agriculture on methods to strengthen controls over the process for registering pesticides, including eliminating the practice of allowing companies to provide information from previously-registered products. In addition, the CGR made specific recommendations to the Ministry for improving its pesticide inspection process, including developing additional and stronger criteria for testing vegetables for the presence of pesticides. The CGR suggested that the Ministry of Agriculture confiscate and destroy vegetables that contain pesticides residues that exceed the allowed limits for human consumption, and perform effective follow-up with farmers to prevent future problems.

Since the completion of the audit, the CGR has been working to convince governmental authorities to strengthen policies and controls related to pesticide use. As a result, the Ministry of Agriculture is currently in the process of developing National and Sectorial Plans to decrease the use of pesticides in the country. Using guidelines set by the Food and Agricultural Organization and the World Health Organization, the Ministry is attempting to establish stricter regulations for the registration and control of pesticides across Costa Rica. This must include requiring that all the necessary tests be completed to assess pesticide quality and risks to the environment and public health in order to register a pesticide. Also, as a result of the audit, the Ministry says that it has stopped the practice of registering pesticides using information from previously-registered pesticides. These and other promised actions by the Ministry will be tracked and verified by the CGR.

The results of the audit generated a national discussion among farmers’ associations, consumer leagues, public authorities, Congress, and others about the use and control of pesticides in Costa Rica. As a result of its experience with this issue, the CGR suggests that other SAIs may wish to examine their public institutions’ efforts to protect human health and the environment. This experience also confirmed for the CGR the important role that SAIs and environmental auditing play in providing policymakers with independent, fact-based reports and recommendations on important issues that so deeply affect the welfare of their nations’ citizens.

Back to Top

WGEA News

The XVIII INCOSAI in Budapest is a success!

The XVIII Congress of the International Organization of Supreme Audit Institutions (XVIII INCOSAI) in Budapest in October 2004 was a busy time for the WGEA. WGEA guidelines were adopted as INTOSAI papers; our 2005–07 work plan was formally accepted; a new kiosk was introduced; and, a successful forum on environmental auditing, with the heads of SAIs, was held. Highlights of these activities are described in this section.

Sheila Fraser, Chair of the WGEA, presented the Chair's Report, which summarized the work for 2002–04. The congress formally adopted the two following WGEA guidelines as INTOSAI papers:

  • Sustainable Development: The Role of Supreme Audit Institutions
  • Environmental Audit and Regularity Auditing

These documents are available on our Web site in the five INTOSAI languages at www.environmental-auditing.org/intosai/wgea.nsf/viewStudies. During the meeting, the congress approved our new 2005–07 work plan, which is available on our Web site.

We inaugurated our new WGEA information kiosk during this meeting. Many participants stopped at the kiosk to discuss environmental auditing and the role of the WGEA with John Reed and Carolle Mathieu, from the WGEA Secretariat. There was significant interest from SAIs new to environmental auditing. For this occasion, the WGEA Secretariat produced 200 CDs containing WGEA documents. Within three days, all 200 CDs were gone! In addition, most of the WGEA documents were swiftly taken from the table!

The key event for the WGEA was the "Heads of SAIs Forum: Experiences in Environmental Auditing" organized by Sheila Fraser and Johanne Gélinas, Chair and Associate Chair of the WGEA. Five heads of SAIs spoke from their hearts on the importance of practicing environmental auditing. More than 150 people from 80 SAIs attended the event and listened intently to Mr. Matute (Peru), Mr. Sekula (Poland), Mr. Mayadunne (Sri Lanka), Mr. Fakie (South Africa), and Mr. Liu (China). For more on this event, please read the WGEA’s article in the INTOSAI Journal in the July 2005 Vol. 32, No.3 edition at www.intosai.org.


Johanne Gélinas introduces session on Insights to
Environmental Auditing to a room full of SAI heads


A packed audience listens to the heads of five SAIs
discuss the importance of environmental auditing


Head of Sri Lanka SAI, Sarath Chandrasiri
Mayadunne, with the President of the Supreme
Chamber of Control of Poland, Mr. Mirosław Sekuła


The Comptroller General of Peru, Dr. Genaro
Matute Mejía, one of the session's featured speakers,
chats with colleagues after the session

Steering Committee approves project work plans for 2005–07

Our last Steering Committee meeting was hosted by the Supreme Audit Office of the Czech Republic in April 2005. We advanced our ambitious three-year work plan by co-ordinating project management and identifying SAIs to be project leaders and sub-committee members for all our projects.

Projects crucial to our 2005–07 work plan involve

  • research and guidance in biological diversity;
  • tips and examples for SAIs conducting co-operative audits;
  • evolution and trends in environmental auditing;
  • web enhancements for the WGEA Web site;
  • auditing commitments from the World Summit on Sustainable Development (WSSD); and,
  • continued guidance on conducting waste and water audits.

Detailed description of all the projects, including the project leaders and member countries involved, can be found here. Minutes of this meeting can be found here. For the remainder of 2005, WGEA members can expect to receive requests for information from leaders on our ongoing projects on biological diversity (Brazil), co-operation between SAIs (Poland and the Netherlands), and WSSD (United Kingdom).


The Steering Committee gets down to business


Steering Committee members tour Křivoklátsko, a
UNESCO Biosphere Reserve in the Czech Republic

Next WGEA meeting in Moscow

From 27 October to 1 November 2005, the tenth meeting of the INTOSAI WGEA (WG10) will be hosted by the Accounts Chamber of the Russian Federation, in Moscow. This meeting is the pre-eminent gathering of environmental auditing professionals, and the focus will be on sharing and learning. There will be four interactive workshops on biological diversity, climate change, increasing the impact of environmental auditing, and facing the challenges of environmental auditing. Keynote presenters from the United Nations Environmental Program and the UN Framework Convention to Climate Change Secretariat have been invited. Last year, over 120 participants from 50 countries attended the meeting in Brasilia, Brazil. Invitations for WG10 in Moscow were sent to the auditors general in June 2005. Even if your SAI is not a member of the WGEA, you may find the workshops and meetings very informative. Contact Anne Charron at Anne.Charron@oag-bvg.gc.ca for more information.

Professional exchanges in environmental auditing

As part of the WGEA's continued strategy to build the capacity of environmental auditing in SAIs, the Secretariat is developing a list of SAIs that provide a professional learning program on environmental auditing to other SAIs. When we announced the WG10 meeting, in June 2005, we included a form that asked SAIs to provide information on internships, twinning, fellowships, training, shadowing, etc. If you have not already done so, please fill in the form and send the information to the Secretariat. Please contact Sylvie Mcdonald at Sylvie.Mcdonald@oag-bvg.gc.ca if you have any questions. For examples of programs, please visit the Learning Centre and Exchanges on our Web site.

What's new on the Web

Keep yourself informed on environmental auditing by checking these important updates on our Web site:

  • Minutes of the Fourth Steering Committee in Prague, Czech Republic (go to: WGEA Business, meetings)
  • Project work plans with contacts, objectives, methods, times lines (go to: WGEA Business, projects)
  • 2005-07 WGEA work plan (go to: WGEA Business, Work Plans)

Back to Top

News Briefs from Around the SAI World

BANGLADESH: WGEA-IDI Training Launches Environmental Auditing Efforts

According to the Bangladesh SAI, environmental auditing at the SAI all started when two of its officers attended the first international workshop on Environmental Auditing organized by the INTOSAI Development Initiative and the Working Group on Environmental Auditing in Antalya, Turkey in November, 2003. Bangladesh’s SAI reports that its representatives at the workshop took full advantage of the training and started implementing the environmental auditing techniques in Bangladesh. Combining its experience in performance auditing, newly adapted auditing techniques, and its knowledge and experience from the Antalya workshop, the Bangladesh SAI recently conducted an audit of waste management in Dhaka city. This report has been submitted to the audited agencies for replies and the SAI expects the final report and its observations to soon be discussed in the Parliament.

BHUTAN: Environmental Issues Become a Priority for Bhutan Government

The Auditor General of Bhutan reports that the Royal Government of Bhutan has initiated seven steps to protect and preserve its environment including the establishment of a trust fund for environmental conservation and setting aside 26 percent of the kingdom as protected area. In support of its government’s environmental mission, Bhutan’s SAI has also taken steps to make environmental issues in Bhutan a priority. For example, the SAI conducted training in July 2004 with Environmental Audit Training as a major focus area. Over 30 auditors participated in the week-long training, using INTOSAI training materials. In addition, within one to two years, the SAI intends to establish a separate environmental audit unit and has already sent one of its senior auditors to a one-year Masters program in the United Kingdom. The Auditor General thanked the IDI and the WGEA for developing an Environmental Audit Course and encouraged training administrators from other regional groups to focus more on this area of audit using course materials developed by the IDI for its Environmental Audit course.

BRAZIL: Environmental Auditing Training In OLACEFS Region Viewed as a Success

In 2003 and 2004, the WGEA worked with the INTOSAI Development Initiative (IDI) to develop and deliver training courses in environmental auditing in Turkey and Kenya. In addition to the WGEA and the IDI, the courses were developed with the assistance of specialists from many other INTOSAI regions. This past year, the course was translated into Spanish and adapted so it could also be applied in the OLACEFS region. The OLACEFS version of the course was supported through an agreement among OLACEFS, the U.S. Government Accountability Office, the Inter-American Development Bank, and the IDI.

The first environmental auditing course in Spanish was held in Colombia, from November 29 to December 10, 2004, with 21 participants. Another course followed in Honduras from April 11 to 22, 2005, with 26 participants. A third course is currently being planned for Brazil in the latter part of 2005. The courses have thus far been very effective, particularly in enabling participants to pass on the knowledge they acquire. In this regard, a particularly important feature of the training is its practical focus—each participant is responsible for proposing to their respective institutions that the knowledge and skills he or she has obtained be used to carry out an actual environmental audit.

CHILE: SAI Audits Government’s Compliance with CITES

The Contraloría General of the Republic of Chile recently conducted an audit of several agencies’ efforts to meet their obligations under the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES). These agencies included Chile’s Agriculture and Cattle Service, National Forest Corporation, Natural History Museum, and National Commission of Scientific and Technological Research. The audit found that the agencies have been meeting their obligations under CITES. However, the audit also found that opportunities exist for improving inter-agency coordination to develop a uniform approach for meeting the requirements of the export and import of the species listed in the CITES appendix. Among its major upcoming environmental activities, the SAI also reports that it is considering an environmental audit of efforts to protect several glaciers from the impact of mining activities.

COSTA RICA: SAI Evaluates “Co-Management” of the National Marine Park Ballena

The concept of Co-management of Wild Protected Areas refers to the negotiation, definition and formalization of the different functioning roles required by the State, interested organizations, and other interested citizens for the proper administration of protected areas. Co-management has been used in recent years to bring more financial resources to bear on efforts to protect and preserve the National Parks and protected wildlife areas in the country. It has also sought to meet the needs of nearby communities, which seek to play a role in managing these resources and share in the benefits they offer from increased international tourism and donations.

One such instance involves the efforts of a local organization, the Association for the Development of the National Marine Park Ballena (ASOPARQUE) under the supervision of the Ministry of Environment (MINAE), to help protect the National Marine Park Ballena. The Contraloría General de la República is currently studying the legal support to facilitate the appropriate participation of Costa Rica’s citizens in the management of Protected Areas, various aspects of ASOPARQUE’s participation, including its use of funds, and the collaboration in this effort among all the participants involved, including MINAE, as they pursue their collective effort to protect the natural resources of the National Marine Park Ballena.

DENMARK: SAI Coordinates a Multi-SAI Audit of Baltic Sea Pollution

The Supreme Audit Institution of Denmark recently coordinated a second audit of the implementation of articles 8, 13, 14, and 16 of the Helsinki Convention regarding pollution from ships in the Baltic Sea. Participating SAIs included the State Audit Offices of Estonia, Finland, and Latvia, the German Federal Court of Audit, the State Control of the Republic of Lithuania, the Supreme Chamber of Control of the Republic of Poland, the Accounts Chamber of the Russian Federation and the National Audit Office of Denmark. The audit found that to reduce the risks of oil pollution, particularly in light of increased shipments of oil in the Baltic Sea, there is a need for comprehensive and realistic assessments, increased cooperation and exchange of information on research, and sharing of best practices.

ESTONIA: State Audit Office Honored with Green Action Award

The title, “Author of GREEN ACTION” was awarded to the State Audit Office (SAO) of Estonia for several environmental performance audits it completed in 2004. These audits highlighted the omissions by government authorities and institutions pertaining to national and international environmental commitments, and the inability of these authorities to ensure adequate risk management in protecting the Baltic Sea. The award was based on SAO reports entitled, “Management of sea pollution incidents and elimination of pollution” (23 November 2004); “Organisation of ship waste management in ports” (28 September 2004); “Government activities in eliminating residual pollution” (10 February 2004); and “Government’s readiness to eliminate extensive environmental pollution on land resulting from an accident” (23 February 2004) For further information see: (http://www.riigikontroll.ee/).

INDONESIA: Audit Board Co-sponsors International Conference on Auditing Tsunami Relief Funds

The International Conference on Promoting Financial Accountability in Managing Funds Related to Tsunami, Conflict and Other Disasters was held in Jakarta from 25 to 27 April 2005. The Conference, co-sponsored by the Audit Board of the Republic of Indonesia and the Asian Development Bank, included a one day visit on 26 April to the tsunami-hit areas in Nanggroe Aceh Darussalam so that the participants could see for themselves the severity of damage and the urgency of the issues at hand. The conference was attended by 142 delegates from 20 countries, 14 international organizations and others. Its main purpose was to enhance financial accountability and transparency in managing funds related to tsunami, conflict and other disasters. According to the Audit Board, participants learned, among other things, that environmental degradation resulting from the disaster must be properly addressed in the reconstruction programs to ensure that the reconstruction efforts would not simply rebuild poverty, but rather lead to a better environment that is conducive to sustainable development.

Among the most significant recommendations agreed upon by Conference participants were that (1) the Indonesian government should develop an internal control system to ensure that the assistance funds are disbursed efficiently, effectively, and economically for the purposes intended and (2) coordinated audits among auditors of donors and recipient countries or international institutions and local auditors should be arranged to enhance audit efficiency, facilitate technology transfer, and help build institutional capacity. The Audit Board has indicated that it will take actions to ensure that these and other recommendations from the conference are implemented properly. In addition, INTOSAI will set up a committee, which will meet in September 2005, to take stock of the progress that has been achieved since the conference.

MONGOLIA: SAI Plans for Environmental Auditing Training

The Auditor General of Mongolia reports that his organization has taken five initial steps to introduce an Environmental Auditing (EA) methodology into its government’s auditing practices. These steps include: (1) participating in the pilot EA training program organized by the IDI and the WGEA in November 2003; (2) joining the WGEA in January 2004 and participating in the Ninth WGEA Meeting in May-June 2004; (3) translating the IDI and the WGEA’s training materials from the EA workshop into Mongolian for training purposes and as future reference materials; (4) organizing and delivering EA training to almost all of Mongolia’s government auditors; and (5) conducting the first audit on biological diversity with the report issued at the end of 2004. The Auditor General would be happy to share the results of the audit with the WGEA. The Auditor General stressed that the country’s National Audit Office is looking forward to actively participating in WGEA activities and learning about members’ EA experiences.

NETHERLANDS: Audit Finds Problems with Efforts to Clean Up Polluted Soil

In March 2005, the Netherlands Court of Audit published a report of a performance audit on the progress of soil remediation. Soil pollution is an important environmental issue in the Netherlands, a densely populated country in which space is scarce. The most important conclusion reached by the Court of Audit is that the Minister of Environment does not have sufficient control over the soil remediation operation, making it uncertain whether the negative environmental legacy of the past, and the subsequent risks to future generations, will be eliminated. The Court based its conclusion on its findings regarding the planning, cost control and quality control of the operation. It found the planning of the operation to be inadequate and aspects of its implementation and supervision to be unsatisfactory. Consequently, it is not clear which sites will be cleaned up and at what cost, whether the remediation work is being carried out properly, or if the soil remediation operation will be completed by the target date of 2030. The Court has highlighted these uncertainties on a number of occasions during the last fifteen years. For more information see: http://www.rekenkamer.nl/9282400/v/ or contact Rob de Bakker, Netherlands Court of Audit (r.debakker@rekenkamer.nl)

NORWAY: SAI Completing Audit on Biodiversity

The Office of the Auditor General of Norway is currently finalizing an audit on Biodiversity using the UN Convention on Biodiversity as a reference point. The Parliament has initiated a program, and an interdepartmental panel specified the intentions in a cluster of proposals for seven different ministries to consolidate an all-embracing approach to the challenges of managing biodiversity. The SAI is auditing the effectiveness of the program. For further information please contact the project manager Lillin Knudtzon at lillin-cathrine.knudtzon@Riksrevisjonen.no

PERU: SAI Plans for Multiple Environmental Audits

The Contraloría General of the Republic (CGR) of Peru reports that in it plans to carry out eight environmental performance audits this year on a variety of issues, including the management of the Rimac river basin, which serves as the main source of water for the city of Lima. The CGR of Peru also reports that is is close to completing an update of its Methodological Guidelines for Governemental Environmental Audits. Finally, following up on a 2003 CGR recommendation, the Pervuian agency that manages natural resources and cultural heritage recently unveiled a new master plan for the management of the historic Machupicchu sanctuary.

SRI LANKA: Environmental Auditing Seen as Growing in Importance

The Superintendent of Audit of Sri Lanka’s Auditor General’s Department reports that the importance of environmental auditing in his country has gained recent attention due to a greater understanding of the impact of environmental issues on individuals, audited institutions, and the country at large. The Department also reports that it has gained additional environmental auditing experience through its work on two recent pilot audits on waste management. In addition, it is planning to conduct an environmental audit of water pollution in Beira Lake, Colombo. Pollution on this lake has gained widespread media attention, in part due to the lack of institutional control over the direct dumping of sewage and wastes into the lake. Finally, the Department notes that WGEA developed workshops have improved its skills, knowledge, and ability to conduct environmental auditing.

Back to Top